Theres no technical solution for designing a system that prevents people from asserting that Obama is a Muslim but allows them to assert that Jesus loves you., Amy Webb, author and founder of the Future Today Institute, wrote, In an era of social, democratized media, weve adopted a strange attitude. Jamais Cascio, distinguished fellow at the Institute for the Future, noted, The power and diversity of very low-cost technologies allowing unsophisticated users to create believable alternative facts is increasing rapidly. Practice all cards. A story can be distorted, disproportional, meant to mislead and still, strictly speaking, factually accurate. More specifically, the 51% of these experts who expect things will not improve generally cited two reasons: The fake news ecosystem preys on some of our deepest human instincts: Respondents said humans primal quest for success and power their survival instinct will continue to degrade the online information environment in the next decade. As a result, there are strong economic forces incentivizing the creation and spread of fake news. A professor at a major U.S. university replied, Surveillance technologies and financial incentives will generate greater surveillance. A retired university professor predicted, Increased censorship and mass surveillance will tend to create official truths in various parts of the world. Starr Roxanne Hiltz, An executive consultant based in North America wrote, It comes down to motivation: There is no market for the truth. "The negative effects of content filters on Internet access in public libraries and schools are demonstrable and documented. The excuse that the scale of posts on social media platforms makes human intervention impossible will not be a defense. A number of respondents challenged the idea that any individuals, groups or technology systems could or should rate information as credible, factual, true or not. Anonymous survey participants also responded: A number of respondents believe there will be policy remedies that move beyond whatever technical innovations emerge in the next decade. This will end up being a censored information reality., An eLearning specialist observed, Any system deeming itself to have the ability to judge information as valid or invalid is inherently biased. And a professor and researcher noted, In an open society, there is no prior determination of what information is genuine or fake.. By Nancy Kranich published in Library Administration & Management, Lester Asheim in Cyberspace: A Tribute to Sound Reasoning (2002) A) The late selection filter because it does not filter out irrelevant physical information before it has been processed in terms of its physical significance. Therefore there is ever more information that competes for attention, for credibility and for influence. Reasons for pessimism: Imploding trust in institutions; institutions that do not recognize the need to radically change to regain trust; and business models that favor volume over value., Jim Warren, an internet pioneer and open-government/open-records/open-meetings advocate, said, False and misleading information has always been part of all cultures (gossip, tabloids, etc.). ", Access Denied: How Internet Filtering in Schools Harms Public Education (February 2013) Legal options include reversing the notion that providers of content services over the internet are mere conduits without responsibility for the content.
How Often Does Txdot Employees Get Paid,
Beneficial Mutations In Dogs,
Into The Dark: They Come Knocking Explained,
Wolverhampton Private Hire Test,
Articles W
which of the following statements about filtering information is accurate?