Further, an early FBI report said the hairs found in the car had no roots which contain the DNA suggesting an evidence switcheroo. Both were deceased. They also found a photo of Patricia taken 11 days before the homicide. Cops under pressure will lie to close a case. I hope she rots in hell. At 17, Patricia dropped out of high school and married landscaper Gary Gabard. When Andy Katrinak comes home to find his wife and infant son gone, he summons the police and tells them he believes they have been abducted, and he suspects his ex-girlfriend Patty Rorrer might be involved. Patricia Rorrer - Wrongful Conviction, Innocent, Nonprofit She seemed like quite an unlikely suspect - at least at first. she didnt need to . Meticulous primping. DNA tests proved the blonde hairs were hers. Forensic tests suggested the hair found in the car and at the murder scene came from Patricia. There was a blood-stained fingernail and hair found on the victims body, and even though (in Keith Morrisons Dateline documentary) the Asst. So where they alive somewhere, and if so how could of Patricia, who was questioned, with not one mark on her kill them? They are a joke. What the prosecution failed to disclose to Rorrers defence team was that the cops, in their zeal to prove their gun theory, visited several addresses of which Rorrer was resident, dug up the gardens in which she was known to do target practice recovered several shell casings and bullets (more than 70), had them ballistically tested, but NOT ONE was found to be a match to the bullet recovered from the victim. Tragedy also touched Patricias life. She hasnt, she didnt get a hard enough sentence. And the obvious answer is Ill tell you why (which really is common knowledge). September 2020 - Forensic Files Now I attack only those whove considered themselves not only judges on this case, but go on to vent their spleen aimed at a person who in my opinion is innocent of this crime, based on all Ive read and watched without fear of retaliation If they so freely attack someone in the most vicious way, why should they be off limits? all other evidence was purely circumstantial. Ive found that in nearly every case, those who are firmly of the opinion shes guilty have an extremely limited knowledge of the case theyve watched one (or perhaps more) of the documentaries which make absolutely no attempt to show anything thats in Rorrers favour (theres plenty, if one bothers to look), and worse, revel in exaggerated and speculative scenes, some of which were never even mentioned at her trial. Plus, he had only a minimal life insurance policy on Joann and he passed polygraphs, according to The FBI Files: Family Secrets. Its nothing short of a feeble stab hoping to impress but really amounts to splitting hairs, or to put it another way, hot air with no substance. He had an attractive new wife and beautiful baby boy. And then in their zealous efforts to show their ire, feel the need to suggest anyone who supports her is deluded. And your appraisal of McIntyre is 100% spot on.
patricia rorrer update 2020